Close Menu
Newsy Tribune
  • Home
  • News
    • United States
    • Europe
    • Canada
    • Australia
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • South America
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Science
  • Money
  • Sports
  • Tech
Trending

Defense attorney's dramatic courtroom move has legal experts talking in Karen Read murder trial

June 10, 2025

Country Singer Conner Smith Behind the Wheel of Fatal Car Accident Involving 77-Year-Old Woman

June 10, 2025

Maximize QSBS Windfalls By Selling Startup Stock Tax-Free

June 10, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Defense attorney's dramatic courtroom move has legal experts talking in Karen Read murder trial
  • Country Singer Conner Smith Behind the Wheel of Fatal Car Accident Involving 77-Year-Old Woman
  • Maximize QSBS Windfalls By Selling Startup Stock Tax-Free
  • Ex-NASCAR star Danica Patrick sounds off on trans athlete debate amid Simone Biles-Riley Gaines feud
  • 113 House Democrats vote against GOP resolution denouncing the antisemitic terrorist attack in Colorado
  • F1 Drops a Legendary Track for 2026 as 2026 Calendar Revealed
  • Newsom’s political future 'practically nonexistent' as LA devolves into riots, social media critics predict
  • Exclusive | Meet the mayor of Rockefeller Center — yes, that’s a real job title
Login
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Tuesday, June 10
Newsy Tribune
Subscribe Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
    • United States
    • Europe
    • Canada
    • Australia
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • South America
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Science
  • Money
  • Sports
  • Tech
Newsy Tribune
Home»Money
Money

Implications of Divergences Between Macroeconomic and Microeconomic Data

News RoomBy News RoomJanuary 7, 2025
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Email WhatsApp Copy Link

Paragraph 1: Market Performance and Tech Dominance in 2024

The year 2024 witnessed robust performance in equity markets, with major indices recording double-digit gains. While the S&P 500 and the tech-heavy Nasdaq surged by over 20%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and the Russell 2000 trailed with gains of 13% and 10% respectively. This disparity stemmed from the outsized influence of the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants, absent in the DJIA and minimally represented in the Russell 2000. These tech behemoths fueled the Nasdaq’s ascent, with their equal-weighted average return exceeding 60%. However, despite this exceptional performance, all seven stocks ended the year below their peak prices, although five reached new highs in December, with Nvidia and Microsoft peaking earlier in November and July, respectively. The market’s optimism carried into the new year, with six of the seven tech giants seeing price increases in the first two trading days of 2025.

Paragraph 2: Macroeconomic vs. Microeconomic Realities

A striking divergence emerged between the rosy macroeconomic picture painted by headline GDP growth and the underlying microeconomic data. While Q3 2024 GDP expanded by 3.1%, and Q4 forecasts hovered around 2.6% (according to the Atlanta Fed), microeconomic indicators suggested a less vibrant economy. Holiday spending, a key barometer of consumer activity, offered a contrasting narrative. Mastercard reported a nominal increase of 3.8%, which, after adjusting for the 2.7% inflation rate, translated to a meagre 1.1% real growth. This subdued consumer spending growth clashed with the robust GDP figures, signaling potential discrepancies in the overall economic assessment.

Paragraph 3: Microeconomic Indicators of Sluggishness

Further scrutiny of microeconomic data reinforced concerns about economic fragility. Industrial production remained stagnant, mirroring 2022 levels. Revised employment data revealed a decline of 725,000 jobs in the year ending November 2024, based on the Household Survey. The average duration of unemployment stretched to 24 weeks, a level last seen in May 2019, raising alarm bells reminiscent of pre-pandemic economic anxieties. The JOLTS report also indicated a contraction in job openings, retreating to pre-pandemic figures. This convergence of unfavorable employment indicators pointed towards a potential rise in the unemployment rate and further lengthening of unemployment duration.

Paragraph 4: Consumer Debt Distress and Rising Delinquencies

Adding to the economic unease, a surge in consumer debt delinquencies and defaults further underscored the microeconomic weakness. Credit card delinquencies witnessed a sharp uptick throughout 2023 and into 2024, while default rates, measured by write-offs, spiked significantly from their relatively low 2022 levels. Similarly, auto loan delinquencies climbed to post-pandemic highs, reflecting the increasing financial strain on consumers. These rising delinquencies and defaults painted a worrisome picture of consumer financial health, contradicting the seemingly strong macroeconomic narrative presented by GDP growth figures.

Paragraph 5: The Fed’s Hawkish Stance and Its Impact

Against this backdrop of conflicting economic signals, the Federal Reserve adopted a surprisingly hawkish stance, leading to a surge in interest rates. Market analysts, such as David Rosenberg, criticized the Fed’s contradictory policy of easing through rate cuts while simultaneously issuing hawkish guidance, creating confusion in the treasury market. This hawkish rhetoric, coupled with a minor uptick in inflation, drove bond yields higher. The 10-Year Treasury yield climbed from 3.6% in September to 4.6% by early January 2025, reflecting the market’s expectation of limited rate cuts in the coming year. This market sentiment contrasted with earlier projections of a sub-3% Fed Funds rate, highlighting the impact of the Fed’s surprising hawkish turn.

Paragraph 6: Inflation Outlook and Interest Rate Projections

Despite the Fed’s hawkishness, the authors maintain a more optimistic outlook on inflation and interest rates. They anticipate that the lagged effect of falling rents, which hold a significant 35% weight in the CPI, will push inflation below the Fed’s 2% target by the end of Q1 2025. This, coupled with a slowing economy, is expected to prompt the Fed to lower its target Fed Funds rate towards the "neutral" level of 3% or below by year-end. This projection diverges significantly from the market’s current expectation of rates hovering around 4%, suggesting a potential overestimation of future rate levels. The authors believe the Fed will be compelled to ease monetary policy as inflation subsides and economic weakness becomes more pronounced.

Related Articles

Maximize QSBS Windfalls By Selling Startup Stock Tax-Free

Can You Stop An Aging Parent’s Out-Of-Control Spending?

12 Reasons You Will Never Be A Multi-Millionaire

Strategies To Retire Without Running Out Of Money

10 Estate Planning Tasks Everyone Must Do Before Dying

USD Weakness – Cyclical or Secular U.S. Dollar Weakness

Editors Picks

Country Singer Conner Smith Behind the Wheel of Fatal Car Accident Involving 77-Year-Old Woman

June 10, 2025

Maximize QSBS Windfalls By Selling Startup Stock Tax-Free

June 10, 2025

Ex-NASCAR star Danica Patrick sounds off on trans athlete debate amid Simone Biles-Riley Gaines feud

June 10, 2025

113 House Democrats vote against GOP resolution denouncing the antisemitic terrorist attack in Colorado

June 10, 2025

Latest Updates

F1 Drops a Legendary Track for 2026 as 2026 Calendar Revealed

June 10, 2025

Newsom’s political future 'practically nonexistent' as LA devolves into riots, social media critics predict

June 10, 2025

Exclusive | Meet the mayor of Rockefeller Center — yes, that’s a real job title

June 10, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest TikTok Instagram
© 2025 Newsy Tribune. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of service
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?