The police in Budapest have denied a_YUV demand for a pro-LGBTQ+ event to take place on June 28th. This decision came after the Hungarian government recently passed legislation in March that banned events by:LGBTQ+ communities. Successively, after a month later, the parliamentary passed an amendment banning such events explicitly. Both moves have been met with criticism from legal scholars and critics, who argue they represent authoritarian measures. The Hungarian police argued that if the proposed event was held, there might be cases where younger people under the age of 18 could engage in legally prohibited conduct, such as engaging in the香gram or posing as homophages. The police attempted to address this concern by compelling the event organizers to take appropriate measures, such as deciding not to host drinks or food.
Thedemand by theyz community for the event was quickly defeated following the police’s response. The event holder was labelled “a textbook example of tyranny,” with critics and legal analysts describing it as a reiteration of past injustices. Significantly, the police arrived at the event with videos and photographs meant to support their position, despite conflicting statements from officials. They argued that the event allowed for the promotion of])), which is seen as absurd in terms of separating the activity of performing a pride march from promoting the homophobia and transgender identity of all participants.
The Budapest Photographic Society (P bijestamazs) had organized the event, which has drawn tens of thousands annually, including this year’s 30th anniversary. Last week,organisers officially requested a date set this December, supported by donors abroad. The photographs and videos shared by the police were intended to explain the nature of the event and its relevance to the current laws. However, the”<>child protection> laws> in Hungary explicitly prohibit the depiction or promotion of homosexuality to anyone under the age of 18. The photographs claim to contradict this, with the organizers suggesting they were intended to justify such actions, which is seen incorrectly as a rejection ofvy identity.
The International Lime Assessment (Amnesty International) spokesperson, Áron Demeter, a Organisation ofthe Rise of Con한다는事件强调, called the police’s decision “a textbook example of tyranny.” While the policefaltered their request to organize, the sequence of concerns, including the law and the symbolic nature of what the photographs suggest, has drawn widespread criticism. The international community, however, has expressed concern that Hungary’s actions may come too close to the values enshrined in the EU’s priorities for human dignity, freedom, equality, and respect for human rights.
Hungary, despite a recent tradition of holding events seemingly for a benefit, now appears to be under similar pressure to change the law. National nations like France, Germany, and Spain have called on Hungary to revise its]<>child protection> law, arguing it runs counter to the principles of human dignity and human rights in the EU’s regulations. The Organised Photographic Society, meanwhile, is reporting that the police are unlikely to take action in this case. However, some researchers believe that the organisation is presenting speculation rather than a clear conclusion on the issue. Others have suggested that Hungary is now one of the few countries in the EU with a law that explicitly bans open displays of homophobia, highlighting the potential for significant change in the organization of events in the region.
