Joseph Massad, a professor at Columbia University, is scheduled to teach a course on Zionism, sparking controversy due to his public statements regarding the Hamas attacks on Israel in October 2023. Massad described the attacks, which involved mass killings, hostage-taking, and widespread destruction, as “awesome” and “astounding” in an article published on The Electronic Intifada, a pro-Palestinian website. This stance has drawn sharp criticism, particularly from those who view his words as supportive of terrorism and antisemitic.
The course, titled “History of the Jewish Enlightenment (Haskala) in 19th century Europe and the development of Zionism through the current peace process between the state of Israel and the Arab states and the Palestinian national movement,” is described on Columbia’s website as an exploration of the historical and ideological underpinnings of Zionism. However, critics argue that Massad’s expressed views on the Hamas attacks raise concerns about his ability to teach the subject objectively. They question whether someone who celebrated the violence against Israelis can provide a balanced perspective on the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the history of Zionism.
The controversy has ignited a debate about academic freedom and the responsibility of universities to ensure balanced and unbiased teaching. Supporters of Massad might argue that his personal views should not disqualify him from teaching the course, emphasizing the importance of academic discourse and the exploration of diverse perspectives, even those considered controversial. They might also argue that attempts to prevent him from teaching the course constitute a violation of his academic freedom.
However, critics contend that Massad’s statements go beyond mere controversial opinions and constitute a glorification of violence and terrorism. They argue that allowing him to teach a course on Zionism would normalize and legitimize these views, potentially creating a hostile environment for Jewish students and undermining the university’s commitment to fostering a respectful and inclusive learning environment. Furthermore, they question whether his public celebration of the Hamas attacks demonstrates a lack of the objectivity required to teach such a sensitive and complex topic.
Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY), a vocal supporter of Israel, publicly criticized Columbia University for allowing Massad to teach the course. Torres questioned the use of taxpayer funds to support what he considers “ideological indoctrination that glorifies the mass murder, maiming, mutilation, rape, and abduction of Jews and Israelis.” His criticism reflects a broader concern about the potential for universities to become platforms for extremist viewpoints, particularly when those viewpoints are perceived as inciting violence or hatred.
The controversy surrounding Massad’s course has also led to resignations within Columbia University. Lawrence Rosenblatt, an adjunct professor at the School of International and Public Affairs, reportedly resigned in protest against the university’s decision to allow Massad to teach the course. Rosenblatt argued that while Massad has the right to express his views, Columbia has a responsibility to ensure objective and fair teaching. He further asserted that allowing someone who advocates for the eradication of a group of people to teach a course related to that group is unacceptable. This resignation highlights the internal divisions within the university regarding this issue and underscores the seriousness of the concerns raised by critics. It further suggests that the controversy surrounding Massad’s course may have lasting repercussions for the university’s reputation and its ability to attract and retain faculty.
