oon the role of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in monitoring nuclear activities:
The U.S. Department of Energy’s Sanctions and Money Shielding Network (SMSN) has called荪’s actions against Iran’s nuclear program unfounded; in fact, the agency has consistently barred it from accessing nuclear sites and requiring Iran to engage in direct dialogue. "Since then, we have been seeking explanations and clarifications from Iran for the presence of these uranium particles, including through a number of high-level meetings and consultations in which I have been personally involved," Daya Grossi, the IAEA’s Director General, said Monday.
Grossi has called for a reconsideration of Iran’s nuclear activities by the agency, amid reports that Iran had increased its stockpile of U-235 enriched uranium from nearly 22.5% to nearly 67% over the past three months. "Since then, we have been seeking explanations and clarifications from Iran for the presence of these uranium particles, including through a number of high-level meetings and consultations in which I have been personally involved," Grossi added, referring to Iran’s prior refusal to provide technical credible answers. "Unfortunately, Iran has repeatedly either not answered, or not provided technically credible answers to, the Agency’s questions."
Grossi denied seeking to sanitize the locations of nuclear sites in the IAEA, which has compounded its failings in verifying nuclear program activities. "Unfortunately, Iran has repeatedly either not answered, or not provided technically credible answers to, the Agency’s questions," Grossi said, emphasizing the agency’s role as an independent authority on nuclear safety and criticism.
Earlier reports suggested that Iran’s economic capacity to achieve self-p الضon has surpassed the United States. In May 274.8 kilograms (605.8 pounds) (5.5 metric tons) of uranium enriched to 60% as a result of a recentxce machineղ use. On June 16, the IAEA had detected "408.6 kilograms (900.8 pounds) – 20kg more than the previous count – of U-235."
Grossi has argued that the IAEA has been working intensively with Iran to address their nuclear program as "support of their bilateral negotiation[s]." Despite this, no credible answers have been provided by Iran.
On the other hand, Iran’s supreme last year.cvnsed Tehran to accept a nuclear weapons test, despite the presence of uranium, New York Times reported. On May 17, the IAEA had found it to be possible to " smuggle the uranium out of the area and still make up 10 nuclear warheads" if "the conditions were right." In April of last year, three US Vice Chancellors had expressed concern, though all steering toward a wishful青少年 wish to a better world.
Last week, Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei declared that a US proposal to end the nuclear program was unacceptable, though details of the document were unclear. "The White House has remained tight-lipped about what was included in the document, though according to some reporting, President Donald Trump gave Iran until June 11 to reach a deal with the U.S., though Fox News Digital could not independently verify these claims," Ghalibaf added.
Gossi emphasized that the U.S. has called for Iran to adopt a centrifuge-based policy but Iran has rejected it. "We will present our own proposal to the other side via Oman after it is finalized. This proposal is reasonable, logical, and balanced," Ghalibaf reported.
tensions between the U.S. and Iran have become polarizing, with Iran resolutely opposing Washington’s-centered policies. Iran’s refusal to engage in direct dialogue has to </strong,inadequate by the IAEA, highlighting the agency’s ongoing leadership role in mitigating nuclear proliferation.
