Close Menu
Newsy Tribune
  • Home
  • News
    • United States
    • Europe
    • Canada
    • Australia
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • South America
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Science
  • Money
  • Sports
  • Tech
Trending

Bachelor Nation’s Kelsey Anderson Explains Why She Got Veneers

February 24, 2025

Indonesian President Prabowo’s quest for food security faces challenges

February 24, 2025

Dodgers' Bobby Miller 'very confident' he can start throwing again soon after scary head injury, manager says

February 24, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Bachelor Nation’s Kelsey Anderson Explains Why She Got Veneers
  • Indonesian President Prabowo’s quest for food security faces challenges
  • Dodgers' Bobby Miller 'very confident' he can start throwing again soon after scary head injury, manager says
  • Trump posts SpongeBob meme to poke fun at outrage over Elon Musk’s email asking federal workers what they did last week
  • Jane Fonda’s Political Stand Steals the Spotlight at SAG Awards
  • Border Patrol taking control of former USAID HQ
  • Sharon Osbourne Admits the ‘Biggest Mistake’ She Ever Made with Husband Ozzy Osbourne
  • Why Trump’s ‘Mar-A-Lago Accord’ Would Financially Matter To You
Login
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Friday, May 9
Newsy Tribune
Subscribe Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
    • United States
    • Europe
    • Canada
    • Australia
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • South America
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Science
  • Money
  • Sports
  • Tech
Newsy Tribune
Home»Politics
Politics

McConnell condemns federal judges for overturning retirement choices as ‘blatant partisanship’

News RoomBy News RoomDecember 3, 2024
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Email WhatsApp Copy Link

Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell criticized two federal judges for reversing their announced retirements after the American people voted to fire Democrats in the last election. McConnell accused the judges of engaging in open partisanship, as it is rare for judges to unretire after a presidential election. U.S. District Judge Algenon Marbley of Ohio and U.S. District Judge Max Cogburn of North Carolina both decided to rescind their retirements after Trump won, leading McConnell to warn other retiring judges against making similar decisions.

Marbley informed President Biden of his intention to stay on the bench due to the lack of a confirmed replacement. Cogburn, on the other hand, withdrew his plans to retire after originally announcing his retirement before the election. Both judges had initially planned to take senior status, allowing them to have reduced caseloads until a successor was appointed. McConnell urged the incoming Trump administration to explore recusal options with these judges, as their decisions to unretire were seen as politically motivated.

McConnell pointed out that it is unprecedented for a circuit judge to unretire after a presidential election and warned two sitting circuit court judges against making similar decisions. He referred to a bipartisan agreement on judicial nominations that secured Trump’s ability to appoint appellate court judges after taking office in January. Republicans agreed to permit Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to vote on Biden’s district court judges in exchange for the Democrats pulling four circuit court nominees lacking votes for confirmation.

Despite the agreement, a Democratic source indicated that only two of the circuit court vacancies are guaranteed to be filled, as the other two judges may ultimately decide against taking senior judge status. McConnell threatened that significant ethics complaints would follow swiftly if any retiring judge reversed their decision to take senior status due to Trump winning the election. He emphasized that judges should enjoy their retirement and leave politics to the political branches, warning of consequences for playing political games within the judiciary.

Overall, McConnell’s remarks highlighted the contentious issue of federal judges reversing their retirements after political changes, particularly after a presidential election. The concerns raised by McConnell underscore the potential ramifications of judges engaging in perceived partisan actions and the impact it can have on the judiciary. The push for judges to remain impartial and avoid political influences is a key factor in maintaining the integrity of the judicial system.

Related Articles

Border Patrol taking control of former USAID HQ

Pope penned resignation letter in 2013: report

Boston councilwoman sounds off after Tom Homan's CPAC promise to 'bring hell': 'We don't scare easy'

Trump announces Dan Bongino will be deputy director of the FBI

DOD tells civilian workforce to ignore Elon Musk's request to report productivity

Trump admin to slash 1,600 USAID positions just before midnight

Editors Picks

Indonesian President Prabowo’s quest for food security faces challenges

February 24, 2025

Dodgers' Bobby Miller 'very confident' he can start throwing again soon after scary head injury, manager says

February 24, 2025

Trump posts SpongeBob meme to poke fun at outrage over Elon Musk’s email asking federal workers what they did last week

February 24, 2025

Jane Fonda’s Political Stand Steals the Spotlight at SAG Awards

February 24, 2025

Latest Updates

Border Patrol taking control of former USAID HQ

February 24, 2025

Sharon Osbourne Admits the ‘Biggest Mistake’ She Ever Made with Husband Ozzy Osbourne

February 24, 2025

Why Trump’s ‘Mar-A-Lago Accord’ Would Financially Matter To You

February 24, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest TikTok Instagram
© 2025 Newsy Tribune. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of service
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?