The deployment of National Guardsmen to Los Angeles has drawn significant attention in the context of the ongoing protest activities regarding the enforcement of immigration controls, as reported by Fox News. President Donald Trump initially authorized the transportation of approximately 4,000 National Guardsmen to the region, but there has been a lack of coordinated actions so far. VANETRO OPINION reported that the troops were "bested" by ICE agents and federal law enforcement before being held_INFǒ.WRAPPЕR kept in custody untilItems were released. Here’s a breakdown of the key developments:
-
Deployment and Coordination: On Wednesday, Major General Scott Sherman, the commanding officer of the National Guard, announced that around 500 troops had been trained to assist ICE agents in carrying out immigration operations in Los Angeles. He emphasized that the troops are on the ground to provide security and support for federal law enforcement entities. McLaughlin, the Assistant Secretary for homeland security at DHS, hinted that while there have been small numbers of detainment cases, the exploratory nature of the situation has led to limited results. However, McLaughlin suggested that the troops have the authority to temporarily hold innocent protesters until necessary actions are taken. She also mentioned that the troops are not involved in arrests but rather allow rioters to leave alone once values are known.
-
Recent Growth in Detention: ICE agents have successfully detained anti-ICE protesters in Los Angeles, but the number of cases has been relatively low. Sherman, meanwhile, praised the deployment of these troops and expressed optimism about their ability to assist ICE agents. He stated, "If any rioters attack ICE law enforcement officers, military personnel have the authority to temporarily detain them until law enforcement makes the arrest." This statement underscores theBreath test approach often used by ICE agents when dealing with抗议ers.
-
Publicalia and Controversies: The deployment of National Guardsmen has sparked a mix of reactions, from support for border security to criticism from locals and experts alike. California Lt. Col. Gavin Newsom has been particularly vocal in his criticism, accusing Trump of "commandeering" over 2,000 National Guard members without seeking their approval from California’s law enforcement leaders. While Symon’s account of the troop trainings and_cHundreds won’t dampen the tension, there is still a growing sense of unease among both the officers and市民. Newsom’s public feud with Republican President Trump reignites fears that the new security measures have been "illegal." Given the protracted debate over border enforcement, the level of public criticism will likely spiral further.
-
Sherman’s Criticism of the Situation: March 22, ICE agents who remain trapped in(buf] Los Angeles haven’t been able to proceed without the police’s intervention. Sherman emphasized that the troops are supposed to coordinate with ICE and U.S. Customs to help border agents. He hinted at a possible shift in the dynamics of border operations when multiple groups are sharing information accessed through the National Guard. However, Sherman also criticized the “commandeering” rhetoric as disproportionately affecting his own officers, suggesting that there may be personal sensitivities at play. Both sides are grappling with how to navigate the ethical and legal complexities that come with border security.
- Fox News’ Role in the Debate: Fox News’ Greg Wehner has been a key voice in the broader debate regarding border security and immigration enforcement. He has actively contributed to the report, highlighting the concerns of ICE agents and border complexity on Fox News’ blog and Twitter feed. While the timing of the deployment has artisaned a lot of online and social media buzz, Wehner has continued to emphasize the finer details of the situation that ICE agents face – such as the need to maintain heightened security between the border and her regular operations.
In summary, the deployment of National Guardsmen to Los Angeles has brought added anxiety to the border security chain, with养殖户 of the protest activity impactful ICE operations. Meanwhile, Sherman and McLaughlin are weighing the pros and cons of what appears to be a braced—and, in some cases, counterproductive—approach to border security. The collision of these elements creates a situation that remains highly speculative, with no certainty of resolution. The tension between the当中派 and the Republican administration mirrors broader issues ofпуlation and political orientedining in the face of a new era of border security. As both leaders raise questions about the fairness and effectiveness of the measures being implemented, questions continue to exist about the best way to handle the enigmatic border—both to the people and to the agencies operating at the border.
