Close Menu
Newsy Tribune
  • Home
  • News
    • United States
    • Europe
    • Canada
    • Australia
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • South America
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Science
  • Money
  • Sports
  • Tech
Trending

Bachelor Nation’s Kelsey Anderson Explains Why She Got Veneers

February 24, 2025

Indonesian President Prabowo’s quest for food security faces challenges

February 24, 2025

Dodgers' Bobby Miller 'very confident' he can start throwing again soon after scary head injury, manager says

February 24, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Bachelor Nation’s Kelsey Anderson Explains Why She Got Veneers
  • Indonesian President Prabowo’s quest for food security faces challenges
  • Dodgers' Bobby Miller 'very confident' he can start throwing again soon after scary head injury, manager says
  • Trump posts SpongeBob meme to poke fun at outrage over Elon Musk’s email asking federal workers what they did last week
  • Jane Fonda’s Political Stand Steals the Spotlight at SAG Awards
  • Border Patrol taking control of former USAID HQ
  • Sharon Osbourne Admits the ‘Biggest Mistake’ She Ever Made with Husband Ozzy Osbourne
  • Why Trump’s ‘Mar-A-Lago Accord’ Would Financially Matter To You
Login
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Friday, May 16
Newsy Tribune
Subscribe Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
    • United States
    • Europe
    • Canada
    • Australia
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • South America
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Science
  • Money
  • Sports
  • Tech
Newsy Tribune
Home»Politics
Politics

Supreme Court TikTok Ban Draws Both Praise and Condemnation

News RoomBy News RoomJanuary 17, 2025
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Email WhatsApp Copy Link

The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision to uphold a federal law effectively banning TikTok unless it’s divested from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, has sparked a wave of reactions, ranging from enthusiastic applause to accusations of anti-democratic overreach. The ruling, set to take effect on Sunday, centers on national security concerns stemming from TikTok’s data collection practices and its ties to China. While acknowledging the platform’s significance as a means of expression and community for over 170 million Americans, the Court underscored Congress’s determination that divestiture is essential to address these concerns.

Prominent figures like former Vice President Mike Pence and Senators Tom Cotton and Ted Cruz lauded the decision as a victory for national security and a blow against Chinese influence. They emphasized the importance of protecting American user data from potential exploitation by the Chinese Communist Party. Pence further called upon the incoming Trump administration to uphold the law and prioritize American privacy and security. Cotton echoed this sentiment, labeling TikTok a “communist spy app” and emphasizing China’s refusal to allow its sale as evidence of its true nature. Cruz concisely stated the necessary action: the Chinese government must relinquish control of TikTok.

Legal experts and advocacy groups also weighed in, with Carrie Severino, President of Judicial Crisis Network, echoing the national security concerns, and Alleigh Marré of the American Parents Coalition celebrating the decision as a win for parents concerned about the platform’s influence on children. Michael Lucci of State Arumor commended the Court’s recognition of the power of elected officials to protect national security and called for TikTok’s sale to an American company or its complete cessation of operations in the United States. This chorus of support reflects the widespread anxiety surrounding potential data breaches and manipulation by foreign adversaries.

However, the ruling has also drawn sharp criticism. David Greene of the Electronic Frontier Foundation decried the decision as “anti-democratic,” arguing that shutting down or forcing the reorganization of communication platforms based on foreign propaganda concerns undermines democratic principles. Similarly, UC Berkeley Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky criticized the Court’s uncritical acceptance of the government’s arguments, questioning the specificity of the national security threat posed by data collection and emphasizing the significant impact on speech caused by banning a platform used by 173 million Americans. These dissenting voices highlight the tension between national security concerns and the protection of free speech and open access to online platforms.

The crux of the debate lies in the balance between national security and freedom of expression. Proponents of the ban argue that the potential risks posed by TikTok’s data collection and its connection to the Chinese government outweigh the platform’s value as a social media outlet. They point to the potential for data breaches, manipulation, and the spread of propaganda as justifications for the ban. Critics, on the other hand, argue that the ban sets a dangerous precedent for restricting online speech and access to information, and that the government has not adequately demonstrated the specific threat posed by TikTok.

The Supreme Court’s decision marks a significant turning point in the ongoing debate over the role of technology, national security, and freedom of speech in American society. The implementation of the ban and its long-term consequences remain to be seen, as the incoming Trump administration will be responsible for enforcing the ruling. The case highlights the complex and evolving relationship between government regulation, technological innovation, and individual liberties in the digital age. The tension between safeguarding national security and upholding fundamental rights will likely continue to be a central challenge in the years to come.

Related Articles

Border Patrol taking control of former USAID HQ

Pope penned resignation letter in 2013: report

Boston councilwoman sounds off after Tom Homan's CPAC promise to 'bring hell': 'We don't scare easy'

Trump announces Dan Bongino will be deputy director of the FBI

DOD tells civilian workforce to ignore Elon Musk's request to report productivity

Trump admin to slash 1,600 USAID positions just before midnight

Editors Picks

Indonesian President Prabowo’s quest for food security faces challenges

February 24, 2025

Dodgers' Bobby Miller 'very confident' he can start throwing again soon after scary head injury, manager says

February 24, 2025

Trump posts SpongeBob meme to poke fun at outrage over Elon Musk’s email asking federal workers what they did last week

February 24, 2025

Jane Fonda’s Political Stand Steals the Spotlight at SAG Awards

February 24, 2025

Latest Updates

Border Patrol taking control of former USAID HQ

February 24, 2025

Sharon Osbourne Admits the ‘Biggest Mistake’ She Ever Made with Husband Ozzy Osbourne

February 24, 2025

Why Trump’s ‘Mar-A-Lago Accord’ Would Financially Matter To You

February 24, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest TikTok Instagram
© 2025 Newsy Tribune. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of service
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?